It’s now 2025, seven years later. May I suggest you do some research to see how many people have reported ailments and sicknesses, including cancer, they now have, that they never had prior to smart meters being installed at their homes. How many people haven’t put 2+2 together yet? I refuse to own a cell phone, and no smart tv is coming in this house. Nobody else is protecting me so I’m trying to protect myself. One more thing, I have an 88 y/o friend whose has had two strokes and has a brain tumor, she gets shots in both eyes four times a year. She lives alone in an apartment complex where there are a lot of apartments, each has it’s own individual smart meter. She can’t refuse a smart meter because she lives in a housing complex. But, even if she could what difference would it make, none, because there are smart meters all around her. Where’s the fairness in that?

@DT Not at all, clearly you don’t understand this technology. You literally only need a 100 or so mW (0.1 watt since you don’t seem versed on this subject) to transmit multiple miles at 2.4GHz, should take less power than that at the 900MHz these smart meters run at. Sounds like they typically run at a duty cycle of less than 1% (depending on the mode and proximity of neighbors, this can even be 0.1% or 0.01%). Even if they’re running it at 1W, it’s still anywhere from 10,000 to 100,000 times less RF exposure than your cell phone while on a call.

Real information and not fear-mongering conjecture here: https://www.emfs.info/sources/meters/smart/#:~:text=That%20radio%20signal%20is%20usually,line%20communications%20or%20fibre%20optics.