Comments on: WHO’s Statement is a Game Changer https://stopsmartmeters.org/2011/06/02/whos-statement-is-a-game-changer/ Fighting for health, privacy, and safety Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:49:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 By: Nora Davidson https://stopsmartmeters.org/2011/06/02/whos-statement-is-a-game-changer/#comment-223689 Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:49:28 +0000 https://stopsmartmeters.org/?p=1101#comment-223689 What about freedom from other human influence? Soldiers died in the trenches during WW2 supposedly to free us from the domination of other dictatorial humans.
Imposing a carcinogenic 2 way surveillance transmitter on every household in the “free” world surpasses even Orwellian dreams.

]]>
By: WE SAY NO FEE: CHARGE THE UTILITY | Stop Smart Meters! https://stopsmartmeters.org/2011/06/02/whos-statement-is-a-game-changer/#comment-32697 Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:41:58 +0000 https://stopsmartmeters.org/?p=1101#comment-32697 […] the landmark designation of smart meter radiation as a Class2B carcinogen by the W.H.O. last year apparently did not drive home to the CPUC the public health implications of putting an RF […]

]]>
By: Smarter Meters https://stopsmartmeters.org/2011/06/02/whos-statement-is-a-game-changer/#comment-12841 Wed, 14 Sep 2011 02:02:07 +0000 https://stopsmartmeters.org/?p=1101#comment-12841 In reply to Redi Kilowatt.

It is fair to say that some parts of Vermont, where substations, power lines, or right of ways were totally demolished by flash flooding caused by TS Irene, sections of the grid will be brand new and, presumably, as “smart” as possible.

From what I’ve read, Vermont is the only state in which every utility has received matching federal funds to install Smart Meters. Utilities will always want to equate Smart Meter installations with making the whole grid smarter, even if that’s a bit of a stretch.

One utility, Vermont Electric Coop, has already employed Smart Meters, although they use the powerlines for data transmission. Here’s an op-ed from the CEO of the utility:

“We have found that the cellular network is not reliable enough for the demands of the smart grid and VEC is aggressively collaborating with telecommunications providers to replace that communications medium with fiber optic lines. In other words, cellular networks can be used as part of the smart grid, but they are not the only option. In fact, they are not necessarily the preferred option. … While the rest of Vermont’s utilities have not yet chosen their smart grid technologies, I suspect that they will mainly use pre-existing or pre-planned networks. In this case, there would not be additional radio-frequency penetration for the smart grid beyond what will be occurring with the ubiquitous rollout of the cell phone network.” (1/18/2011) – http://www.vermontelectric.coop/news-center/197-hazards-of-the-smart-grid

“Though smart grid technology has been introduced in California and other states, Vermont’s largest utilities will be the first to rely on a “wireless canopy” to implement the system.” (7/21/2011) – http://vtdigger.org/2011/07/21/gmp-vtel-and-cvps-pledge-support-for-broadband-expansion/

So much for employing existing and tested methods….

]]>
By: Redi Kilowatt https://stopsmartmeters.org/2011/06/02/whos-statement-is-a-game-changer/#comment-12839 Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:58:33 +0000 https://stopsmartmeters.org/?p=1101#comment-12839 In reply to Smarter Meters.

Nobody in this country has a smart power grid, but do you have the so called “smart” meters in Vermont ?
If so, they will not help your recovery at all, or make you power grid “smart”.
The upgrading of the power grids in this country are something that is in the works and will cost at least $300 billion dollars, and take at least 10 years to complete, once they get started, and they have not yet started.

]]>
By: Smarter Meters https://stopsmartmeters.org/2011/06/02/whos-statement-is-a-game-changer/#comment-12823 Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:34:14 +0000 https://stopsmartmeters.org/?p=1101#comment-12823 It’s quite sad to see how little effect the WHO reclassification has made for most people, especially those already suffering due to second-hand RF.

Here in Vermont, while we’re struggling to recover from a serious natural disaster, few people have the time or energy to worry about “smart grid”. In fact, some have already suggested that we’d be recovering more quickly if we had Smart Meters.

http://smartermeters.blogspot.com/2011/09/may-31-2011.html

The denial runs deep.

]]>
By: onthelevelblog https://stopsmartmeters.org/2011/06/02/whos-statement-is-a-game-changer/#comment-12802 Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:19:47 +0000 https://stopsmartmeters.org/?p=1101#comment-12802 In reply to Bruce Bowen.

That really is the solution. Perhaps Santa Cruz County will elect a new sheriff who will jail the corporate criminals. Then we’d see things changing around here.

]]>
By: Bruce Bowen https://stopsmartmeters.org/2011/06/02/whos-statement-is-a-game-changer/#comment-12801 Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:15:04 +0000 https://stopsmartmeters.org/?p=1101#comment-12801 PG&E’s reputation for caring about public health is not exactly shining. Several blogs/news releases have indicated that hexavalent chromium is once again spreading out (600 yards) past the “protective barrier” in Hinkley Calif. And the tragedy of the San Bruno gas explosion (8 dead and 38 homes destoyed) is still a solemn reminder that PG&E does not care much about public health. People have been calling for PG&E executives to be jailed. I agree. Who made PG&E god?

]]>
By: Soapbox Jill https://stopsmartmeters.org/2011/06/02/whos-statement-is-a-game-changer/#comment-5163 Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:07:18 +0000 https://stopsmartmeters.org/?p=1101#comment-5163 Great post and info. I warn you folks, though, a lot of Americans could care less about the WHO’s opinions. They want their gadgets at any price, and feel they have a right to them. They believe that since we already have so many wireless everyday devices, a few more won’t hurt. And they think people who are sensitive to cell phones, smart meters, etc., are nuts.

The truth is lots of people are already addicted to their cell phones. Remember nicotene? And the convenience and power of immediate data. Wow. How can we live without it? Easy, I say, and I worked as a librarian for two decades. I am no luddite, but when a technology creates health risks, and everyone is forced to be exposed involuntarily, it is time to fight. Our backs are against the wall.

Secondhand cigarette smoke was nothing compared to ambient rf because it did not go through walls for miles. I am a person who generally likes to live and let live, and people have their fun stuff, but that does not work when the fun stuff holds serious health risks and actually makes some of us immediately ill.

Keep up the good fight!

I was just told my gym cannot turn the wifi off when I come, despite a letter from my doctor. They said their computer system would not allow wifi to be off.

]]>