Comments on: “PG&E, I don’t want to be part of your experiment!”

By: A Primer on the FCC Guidelines for the Smart Meter Age | Stop Smart Meters!

A Primer on the FCC Guidelines for the Smart Meter Age | Stop Smart Meters! — Sat, 10 Mar 2012 05:35:04 +0000

[…] “Personal choice” in consumer devices has lead to massive involuntary public exposure from ever-proliferating antenna arrays near homes, schools, and public places–like the DAS antennas currently going up in residential neighborhoods. Mouthing off about “personal choice” has been the devious way that PG&E and other utilities have avoided facing up to the effects their meters have on whole communities, the general public, and those exposed to large banks of smart meters. […]

By: Ignore PG&E’s Certified Letter–Try this Letter Instead | Stop Smart Meters!

Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:16:35 +0000

[…] yet opt out, despite the fact that there are 49 cities and counties with bans as of now. People living next to banks of meters are left without options. Smart-meter-free zones are not provided for. And many of us are wondering […]

By: Revised PG&E Smart Meter Opt-Out Proposal Has Arrived… | Stop Smart Meters!

Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:44:05 +0000

[…] reckoning with the exposure that banks of meters produce for certain buildings. For those people who by no choice of their own are living next to the whopping RF pulses coming […]

By: Robert

Robert — Sat, 27 Aug 2011 11:05:24 +0000

Carol, have someone replace your ‘Smart Meter’ with an analogue meter. Nothing else will get the job done.

By: onthelevelblog

onthelevelblog — Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:18:22 +0000

In reply to Carol. This is another case of PG&E instructing their call center employees to lie. The extra charge has NOT been approved yet- this is simply PG&E's proposal for how they want to gouge you and extort money from you. How dare they lie and deceive the public like this? Where are our elected officials? Where is Governor Moonbeam? Sitting pretty in the pocket of PG&E criminals that's where. You should purchase an analog meter and get someone to replace the danger meter they forced on you using illegal and deceptive tactics.

By: Carol

Carol — Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:43:50 +0000

Last week I received a notice about installing smart meters. I called PG&E with my concerns about health issues that can derive from the meters (I live in a complex, so I have my other 2 neighbors meters in front of my home also) I told them that I run a family home daycare and that I was concerned about their well being as well as my own family, so I asked them if could opt out. They told me I did have the option but it would cost me a one time fee of $135-$200 and an extra $20 a month to have someone come and read my meter. Unfortunately I couldn’t afford that so they came on Thursday and installed one (only mine). Now I feel like such an idiot for calling being that the other meters in front of my house didn’t get changed. Is there anything I can do to reverse what I have done?

By: Ron

Ron — Tue, 16 Aug 2011 20:20:17 +0000

Hi Amy,

I posted a few questions pertaining to your previous report titled “SF Condo Building Fends Off Smart Meter Installer”. Perhaps you didn’t see them there. I will reiterate them here, and any answers you can provide would be much appreciated.

Can you/would you please document the two statements in your report:

1. “PG&E has stated clearly that it is not liable in any way for any health, safety, or fire problems arising from “smart” meter installations—something that should raise a red flag for home owner associations everywhere.”
Clear statements from PG&E are scarce as hens’ teeth. Where did you find this one?

2. “Insurance companies won’t insure against any “smart” meter damage or liability.” Which insurance companies? Where can I get a position statement from them that explicitly denies coverage against any “smart” meter damage or liability?

Thanks,

Ron