Here’s the point. As a decision maker, when one does not know the full medical implications of adopting a certain public policy, a conscious and true public servant errs on the side of protecting the public and basis the policy on the “precautionary principle” that allows policy not to go forward to be made. I don’t know a scientist who doesn’t know that.

The burden of proof lies with the utility to prove this technology is safe.

Correction – There is no cost savings with smart meters because they are working constantly 24/7 in perpetuity sending and receiving data to all the rest of the devices in the ‘smart’ grid (routers, relays, cell towers, cell phones, etc.) causing some amount of vibration to occur perhaps from the switching mode power supply (the gizmo that makes the dissonant currents “compatible”). In addition, they put building structures at risk of fire from natural solar radiation especially in those not and getting hotter SW US states causing the plastic meters to melt.

I would like to invite you to read the Global 2000 Report, and then do a study of Agenda 21, then go on to study the Millenium Project. These meters are just one part of a larger plan. The Scientific community, as well as the Gay community is very on board with what the goals related to these documents, and you will not have much luck changing the minds of either. http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/index.shtml just one link that I already had easy access to.

Maybe do own study? You might want to place your wifi router and cordless phone base station within three feet of your head when sleeping.
Please share your results. You may want to look out for signs of “radiowave sickness”.