Take Back Your Power California: Protest PG&E Monday

PG&E Headquarters 77 Beale St. San Francisco

Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) is a company with a long history of exchanging public health and safety for private income and profit.  This is more true than ever before, after the preventable and deadly catastrophic explosion in San Bruno, the nightmarish risks of nuclear power, climate change, and the catastrophic effects of the “smart grid” which has hit communities all over California hard- in the checkbook, decimating our privacy, risking national security, damaging our health, and risking deadly fires.

Then charging us a fee to “opt out.”

Who’s really in charge here anyway?

On May 14th, PG&E’s shareholders will hold their annual meeting at the company’s downtown SF headquarters to hear about their increasing profits at our expense (17% increase in quarterly profit).   Tired of the threats, intimidation, extortion and abuse?  How much more will you take California?

It’s time to TAKE BACK OUR POWER from corporate greed.

It’s time to TAKE BACK OUR POWER from PG&E.

Protest outside and let your voice be heard- if you are a PG&E shareholder, go inside and confront management with the crimes they are committing.


This entry was posted in California, Citizen rebellion, Installer Threats and Assaults, PG&E, San Francisco. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Take Back Your Power California: Protest PG&E Monday

  1. Riki Berlin says:

    I am a renter. My landlord told me that I would have to pay for the opt-out scenario. When I move, will I have to pay all over again? How is this fair, that we as renters have to pay repeatedly (every time we move) or accept the new meters? This stinks.

  2. Don't Biobank Me of San Francisco preferred comment says:

    The Nuremberg Code consisting of 10 Points was incorporated into California Law
    according to Wikipedia. Thank Heavens for that. We must demand protection under that Law.
    We are being subjected to being unwitting lab rats; forced against our will and certainly to our detriment to be subject members of a de facto Biobank which is now being used for the ambitious experiment to determine what long term, -as in many years, exposure to an alien man made EMF 24/7 environment such that life on planet Earth has never experienced,- effects and outcomes such an alien manmade EMF environment will induce in large populations in California demarcated by their being captive customers of one ptivate utility monopoly company or another of the cartel of private utility corporations operating in California . Possible and likely effects which are known form the research, in the last twenty years, at least
    that which is within the public domain, of the harm that can reasonably be predicted by such exposure to the ELF RF radiation from the wifi smart meter devices, perhaps multiplied by the grid when fully in place, includes damage to the DNA and damage to the Blood-Brain barrier. The extent of damage and the resulting illness and disease and probably curtailment of lifespan remains to be seen as this experiment
    using large populations, effective living-Biobanks, virtually imprisoned in an artificial, man made, 24/7 EMF Environment progresses through the years.
    It would have been untenable to try to ascertain informed consent from the utility captive customer
    population groups; who in their right mind would willing subject themselves to an environment
    that is likely to damage their DNA and Blood-Brain Barriers??
    I assume that the CPUC five current commissioners are deemed to be the trustworthy agents of the
    captive utility customers whose interest and safety has been placed in the hands of the commissioners;
    the commissioners are mandated to protect the captive utility customers and act in the public interest and safety. How could they be deemed other than TRUSTWORTHY?
    So we are now Biobanked but no one is supposed to know it.
    Nevertheless I think we might do well to look into the issues of Informed Consent to medical/Scientific
    experimentation and the Nuremberg Code 10 Points is not a bad starting place, especially as it was incorporated into our California Law.
    “The ten points of the Nuremberg Code

    The 10 points are, (all from United States National Institutes of Health) [2]
    The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him/her to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
    The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
    The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
    The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
    No experiment should be conducted where there is a prior reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
    The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
    Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
    The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
    During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
    During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
    Reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181–182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949. Note that complete electronic copies of the Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuernberg [Nuremberg] Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10 [3] are available online, as are most of the other proceedings from the Nuremberg Trials.[4]”

    [ from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Code ]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.