Please Distribute Widely!  Deadline Wednesday March 6th

Even if you commented during the comment period, please read on.  If there are points that you wish you had included, you can file a reply as well.

Easy directions for brief comments linked from the bottom.

Are you concerned about radiofrequency (microwave) radiation emissions from smart meters, cellphones, WiFi, cellphone antennas, baby monitors etc or you are having health problems as a result of the FCC’s outdated physics-based radiofrequency radiation limits ?  This is your chance to make your voice heard!

Support biologically-based radiofrequency radiation safety limits or the FCC could elect to raise its existing outdated physics-based safety limits.  Please submit a reply in the reply round at the FCC by March 6, 2013.

For the first time since the passage of the 1996 Telecom Act, the FCC is specifically requesting/allowing comment on its radiofrequency radiation limits.

This is a second opportunity for your voice to be heard on the question of the inadequacy of the outdated thermally-based FCC radiofrequency radiation exposure limits.  Submitting your document in an official FCC proceeding is the only way to get information to the FCC that it is legally required to consider.

See Stop Smart Meters! Analysis on inadequate FCC limits  for background information on the FCC radiofrequency radiation limits.


The FCC does not have the expertise to set safety limits so they have to adopt them from somewhere.  Thus far, they have felt that they have only two options – the IEEE and the ICNIRP .  At the EPA’s urging, they chose the lower ones and adopted the IEEE exposure guidelines which are outdated and inadequate.

The Industry would like them to re-consider and adopt the more lenient ICNIRP guidelines.

In other words, the radiofrequency radiation limits could be RAISED if the FCC does not receive enough compelling comments asking that they be lowered.

TAKE ACTION NOW- More details here:

This entry was posted in Cancer, Democracy, EPA, FCC. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to TELL IT TO THE FCC

  1. Paul H says:

    Our shepherds are not looking out for us. These people cannot be so incompetent that they are incapable of looking at the evidence and recognizing that America has a huge problem. Cancer, Autism, Diabetes, Alzheimer’s, and mental health are all skyrocketing. Foundations looking for a cure are simply looking to pay their directors six figure incomes. Take for an example a recent Breast Care Awareness scam where .35 cents out of $10 actually goes to the cause. Why are these groups looking for the cure and not the cause? Because there is no money involved. As long as there is wireless we will continue with these problems. Also, we are losing our pollinators and know one knows why? Even though there is research showing a link it remains ignored. Our shepherds are looking out for their pocketbook and will soon find they have lead us to catastrophe.

    We have observed the same reaction from people that have done zero research (not including a google search of “is wireless bad for you”) and that is we must be crazy for insinuating that wireless is the leading cause of all our health problems. They don’t teach it in medical school so it must not exist or if we were educated in the dangers maybe they wouldn’t exist?

    Lastly, my handicapped father and diabetic since 1984, with frequent sugar levels of 300-500, is now waking up with continuing levels of 87 taking only a quarter of his medication. This happened after a long time neighbors cordless phone base station, propagating levels around .75uW/w2, was replaced with a corded one.

  2. Be thankful you have either a) learned that microwave energy is harmful or b) have had acute health reactions too it. Most folks (it would appear) just can’t get enough of this stuff!

    No wonder all the RF limits are set so high that no devices ever surpasses them. They are set by the people (radio engineers) who are likely most attracted to this energy.

    Possibly a case of being “hardwired” this way through evolution.

    Stay strong, folks!

  3. Anonymous says:

    Thank you so much for bring this to awareness and to the public. Expose, expose, expose. The current radioactive frequency standard is overdue for breakdown.
    Kudos to all of you at Stop Smart Meters and let’s start pushing the local free market for the biologically based natural frequency and standards … most importantly, push the national and local legislation for biologically-based radiofrequency radiation safety limits.

    Boycott 4G – 5G electronics and wi-fi.
    Thank you so much for bring this to awareness and to the public. Expose, expose, expose. The current radioactive frequency standard is overdue for breakdown.
    Kudos to all of you at Stop Smart Meters and let’s start pushing the free market for the biologically based natural frequency and standards … most importantly, push the legislation for biologically-based radiofrequency radiation safety limits.

    Boycott 4G – 5G electronics and wi-fi.
    Protest against installations of current and future (health destructive) cell phone towers in your neighborhood. We need a cell phone tower watch. They’re totally out of control and everywhere and so is the industry.

    Average frequency of a healthy human body during the daytime is 62 to 68 Hz.
    Current wi-fi technology runs at 2.45 Mega Hertz.
    2.45 MHz = 44 Hz.
    42 HZ is the frequency of cancer.

    “Average frequency of a healthy human body during the daytime is 62 to 68 Hz.”

    We threw away our “smart phones” and cordless phones, no t.v. and went cabled on the computer. No more wireless.

    the frequency of the human body:

    “According to Dr. Robert O. Becker in his book “The Body Electric,” the human body has an electrical frequency and that much about a person’s health can be determined by it. Frequency is the measurable rate of electrical energy flow that is constant between any two points. Everything has frequency.”

    “Dr. Royal R. Rife found that every disease has a frequency. He has found that certain frequencies can prevent the development of disease and that others would destroy diseases. Substances of higher frequency will destroy diseases of lower frequency.”

    “In 1992, Bruce Taino of Taino Technology, an independent division of Eastern State University in Cheny, Washington, built the first frequency monitor in the world. Taino has determined that the average frequency of a healthy human body during the daytime is 62 to 68 Hz. When the frequency drops, the immune system is compromised. If the frequency drops to 58 Hz, cold and flu symptoms appear; at 55 Hz, diseases like Candida take hold; at 52 Hz, Epstein Bar and at 42 Hz, Cancer. Taino’s machine was certified as 100 percent accurate and is currently being used in the agricultural field today.”

    “The study of frequencies raises an important question concerning the frequencies of substances we eat, breathe, and absorb. Many pollutants have low frequencies and cause the bodies healthy frequencies to be lowered and weakened. Processed or canned food has a frequency of zero and tend to lower healthy frequencies within the body towards degenerative diseases. Fresh produce has up to 15 Hz; dry herbs from 12 to 22 Hz; and fresh herbs from 20 to 27 Hz. Essential oil frequencies start at 52 Hz and go as high as 320 Hz; which is the frequency of Rose Oil. These higher frequencies create an environment in which disease, bacteria, virus, fungus, cancer, etc., CANNOT live.”…..“In one study the doctors took two young men who had a 66-hertz frequency. One held coffee and his frequency dropped to 58 in 3 seconds. The other gentleman drank it and his frequency dropped to 52 in 3 seconds.”

  4. M. E. Kadaster (BS and MS in Engineering, MBA) says:

    The present Industry, Government, and FCC standards are woefully inadequate in controlling the levels as well as proximities of RF sources, including cell phone base stations, “smart meters” etc. I am reminded of the days when dangers of x-ray radiation were not fully understood, and shoe stores had x-ray machines that buyers would use to stick in their foot with the shoe to see how the fit looked!
    Health warnings are rolling in from Europe and other parts of the world where (the industry-government complex is not stifling this discussion as effectively as here and) the danger signs are now being recognized and discussed.
    Please reduce the RF emission levels and keep their locations away from residential areas and schools; let us have a detailed discussion about allowable limits, with public input. There are very knowledgeable engineers and scientists among us who are ready to provide their input.

    • Nancy says:

      I and many others of my age are poster children for survivors of childhood exposure to excess radiation – Roger Ebert is also among us.

  5. Robin Ashton says:

    I think it is extremely important that the amounts of radiation from our increasing
    elektrosmog be dealt with in an expedient manner.
    There is not even a question after decades of research on the effects on a cellular level to us.
    Do you think it’s any wonder cancer and alzheimer’s is on the rise, or that dementia is in the process of becoming the number one health problem? It’s not just age I can tell you.
    The amounts of wireless radiation are way out of proportion to what is necessary, and even more out of proportion to what is safe.

    I helped write a research paper a few years back that was presented at AEHF to help educate medical personnel on this situation.
    It is high time people started caring about people first, then the businesses making the dollars.
    Thank you.

  6. King Reggin says:

    You people are all insane and traitors to AMERICA by trying to stop PROGRESS. Hopefully the government will stop you all soon, so we may advance forward for once, rather then be held back by a bunch of hippies.

    • CZehfus says:

      Have been a conservative most of my life. Love America and apple pie. Believe in the U.S. Constitution. IMHO, progress should not involve proliferating pulsed radiofrequency radiation into every square inch of people’s lives. Decades of reputable science consistently show biological harm from non-thermal, pulsed RF exposures. Here is just a sample of this evidence that have been ignored by the powers-that-be responsible for protecting the public from dangerous products and emissions.
      1. Dodge, CH. 1969. “Clinical and Hygienic Aspects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields: A Review of the Soviet and Eastern European Literature. Biological Effects and Health Implications of Microwave Radiation,” Symposium Proceedings, Richmond, Virginia, September 17-19, 1969 (BRH/DBE 70-2) (PB 193 898).

      Author Christopher Dodge, affiliated with the Library of Congress, wrote the first comprehensive review of the world (especially the Soviet and Eastern European) literature on the biological effects of microwaves in 1964. The current document was written 5 years later during which time the author was with the Biosciences Division, U.S. Naval Observatory, in Washington, D.C. This document concentrates on human clinical studies and occupational hygiene surveys of microwave exposure.
      from Magda Havas site:

      2. “Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (‘Effects’) and Clinical Manifestations attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation,” authored by Zorach (“Zory”) R. Glaser, Ph.D., LT, MSC, USNR.

      On page 4 of this 106-page document, the security classification reads “unclassified”, and the distribution statement reads “This document has been approved for public release and sale; its distribution is unlimited.” It was a Research Report (Project MF12.524.05-0004B, Report No. 2) commissioned by the Naval Medical Research Institute, and was authored by Zorach (“Zory”) R. Glaser, Ph.D., LT, MSC, USNR.
      From the Zory Glaser Archives at Magda Havas site:

      3. Cellular Telephone, Russian Roulette: A Historical and Scientific Perspective by Robert C. Kane, 2001.
      Robert C. Kane had been working as top developer inside Motorola for decades, developing mobile phones. He died from brain cancer a few years ago, not without leaving this planet with a message, which you can find in his book: Author Robert C. Kane was actively employed in the telecommunications industry for more than thirty years. He had a BSEE from the Midwest College of Engineering, an MSEE with an emphasis in electromagnetics from the Illinois Institute of Technology and also at the Illinois Institute of Technology. He completed the full course of study and research leading to the Ph.D. in electrical engineering with emphasis in the fields of electromagnetics and solid-state physics.

      As a research scientist and product design engineer, he was directly involved with programs and projects for the design and development of portable cell phones, radio frequency mobile radios, microwave telecommunications systems, video display systems, and biological effects research.

      Entire out-of-print online book available here:

      4. And of course, the 2012 updated BioInitiative Report with over 1800 studies from the past 5 years showing RF biological damage

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.