Video of April 13th California Landline-Killing AB2395 Hearing

**Contact the State Assembly Appropriations Committee Who Will Vote Soon on this Bill – Tell Them to:


Timepoints for the above video of the Utilities Committee Hearing on April 13th

Committee on Utilities and Commerce
April 13, 2016
Assembly Bill 2395

Deregulation and Discontinuation of Analog Landline Service

Evan Low, Bill Author: 00:16

Ken McNeely, President, AT&T California: 05:07
Gary Passmore, Vice President North, Congress of California Seniors: 10:43
Dave Roberts, Fire Chief, El Dorado Hills Fire Department: 14:25
Public comment: 17:22

Tom Runnion, Vice President, Comm. Workers of America (CWA), District 9: 24:24
Kevin Mottus, California Brain Tumor Association, Los Angeles: 32:01
Josh Hart, Director, 37:35
Mark Toney, Executive Director, The Utility Reform Network (TURN): 44:44
Public comment: 48:48

Hazel Miranda, Director, Office of Governmental Affairs, California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC): 1:07:33

Bill Quirk:  1:09:07
Ken McNeely

David Hadley: 1:16:42
Ken McNeely

Jay Obernolte: 1:23:35
Ken McNeely

Rocky J. Chavez: 1:25:11
Ken McNeely

Philip Y. Ting: 1:29:34
Ken McNeely
Evan Low

Eduardo Garcia: 1:32:10
Brian Dahle: 1:33:55
Susan Talamantes Eggman: 1:34:40
Ken McNeely
Tom Runnion: 1:40:12
Roger Hernandez: 1:41:53
Jim Patterson: 1:46:03
Mike Gatto: 1:47:42

Evan Low: 1:50:47
VOTE: 1:53:36

This entry was posted in California, Cancer, Cell phones, Citizen rebellion, CPUC, Democracy, Electro-Hyper-Sensitivity, EMF Mitigation, Environmental Concerns, FCC, health effects, landlines, legal issues, radio-frequency radiation, Sacramento, Safety, Smart Grid, World Health Organization. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Video of April 13th California Landline-Killing AB2395 Hearing

  1. No on this Bill - Yes to Protecting our Landlines, Our Health, Our Privacy. says:

    Vote NO on AB3295. Protect Our Landlines and to Protect Liberty.

    Is it unconstitutional to enforce
    and force cell phone lines for those that are sensitive to wireless and radiation?
    Many of our elders cannot use cell phones and children do need to be protected.
    I am a sensitive to wireless and the microwave radiation has affected many
    of our local environments, our living greens, our weather, and our own health.
    Forcing the public to use cellphone lines also leaves sensitive personal information and privacy unprotected.

    Are These “lawmakers” imposing their will on the true will of the public. Has there
    been a public hearing?

    Also, we need new local legislation to begin testing the degenerative
    effects of wireless phones and wireless cellphones for second hand microwave
    radiation. So far, the wireless industry has been unchecked and out of control –
    there has been no checks and balances. Where are the local mandates for testing –
    there is testing for pesticides, testing for water …. our communities need mandates
    for testing for microwave radiation due to the current frequencies and technology
    used in “wireless”.

    Shouldn’t we have the option for Ethernet and to Opt-Out of “Wi-fi”?

    Thank you.

  2. No on this Bill - Yes to Protecting our Landlines, Our Health, Our Privacy. says:

    Libertarian Platform : Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of individual liberty, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to agree to such new governance as to them shall seem most likely to protect their liberty.

  3. anonymous says:

    Why Is WiFi Bad?
    This video says it all, but in case you want more proof, just read on…

    The guy in this video is Barrie Trower – a scientist who worked for the British Military Intelligence for 11 years and he specialized in microwave and stealth weapons.

    You can also listen to our Mum’s excellent teleseminar with Dr. Magda Havas PhD, where they discuss microwave radiation in our homes, schools, and how to protect ourselves.

    1. Children’s brains are way smaller, so it affects us way more. And we have more water in children’s brains so electromagnetic radiation is conducted faster and stronger.

    “Of particular significance for children are studies which indicate that children absorb more radiation in the brain than adults which may indicate a greater risk of brain tumours.”

    “A two-minute cell phone call alters a child’s brain function for an hour.”

    (Source: The child scrambler – What a mobile can do to a youngster’s brain in 2
    minutes, UK Sunday Mirror, April 1, 2004.)

    2. Cell phones have up to 2.4 ghz frequency, but wireless can have up to 6 ghz frequency. But scientists say it is not the frequency that is so important, but the second carrier wave (the information carrying radio wave – ICRW) and the fact that it is pulsed, that is the main health problem. All these countries have banned wifi in schools, why can’t we?

    “The Public Health Department of Salzburg has warned that WiFi should not be put in schools or nurseries. The Austrian Medical Association is lobbying against the deployment of WiFi in schools.”

    “The Bavarian Parliament has recommended that no schools in the province use wireless LAN networks. The Frankfurt City Government said that it would not install WiFi in its schools until it had been shown to be harmless.”

    “Professor Johansson at the Department of Neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm has sent a letter advising against the use of WiFi to Swedish School Governors.”

    3. Children absorb more radiation than adults, so the risk for kids is much higher than for adults.

    “The Stewart Report (2000) states that children absorb more energy per Kg of body weight from an external electromagnetic field than do adults.”
    “A 5 year old will absorb around 60% more than an adult.”

    “Exposures in bone marrow may be up to ten times greater in children than adults.” (Microwave news, 2008, 22nd July)

    4. Radiation disturbs our learning and damages our brain function.

    “Scientists have discovered that a call lasting just two minutes on a cell phone can alter the natural electrical activity of a child’s brain for up to an hour afterwards.

    And they also found for the first time how radio waves from mobile phones penetrate deep into the brain and not just around the ear.

    The study by Spanish scientists has prompted leading medical experts to question whether it is safe for children to use mobile phones at all.

    Doctors fear that disturbed brain activity in children could lead to psychiatric and behavioural problems or impair learning ability.

    It was the first time that human guinea pigs were used to measure the effects of mobile phone radiation on children. The tests were carried out on an 11-year-old boy and a 13-year-old girl called Jennifer.”

    (*The child scrambler–What a mobile can do to a youngster’s brain in 2 minutes”, UK Sunday Mirror, April 1, 2004.)

    You may wonder what this has to do with WiFi – well, WiFi is THREE TIMES stronger than cell phone radiation

    5. People getting sick from WiFi radiation today have exactly the same things wrong with their body as the radar operators during World War 2 – when they were using the same microwave radiation to find out where the enemy planes were.

    “What you need to know is that our federal guidelines are based on a thermal (heating) effect. If the radiation doesn’t heat your body it is assumed to be safe. This is NOT true. We now have plenty of scientific evidence showing that we have adverse biological and health effects at levels well below the thermal guidelines.

    Microwave radiation was used for the first time during the 2nd world war as radar, locating enemy aircrafts. We are now using the same frequencies to heat our food (microwave ovens), to make phone calls (cell phones and cordless phones), to listen to our babies (wireless baby monitors), to connect to the internet (WiFi and wireless routers), to submit our electricity usage (smart meters), to protect our homes (wireless monitors) . . .

    There is only so much of this radiation that people can tolerate before they become sick, and people are becoming sick. The illness is called electrohypersensitivity (EHS) and is virtually identical to microwave sickness experienced by radar operators during the second world war.”

    (Source: Magda Havas, PhD (Associate Professor of Environmental & Resource Studies, Trent University)

    What’s the difference between WiFi and WiMAX?

    WiMAX is way stronger than WiFi.

    WiMAX is a type of wireless Internet service. People call it “Wi-Fi on steroids” – like those bodybuilders who are so pumped up they don’t even look human. WiMAX uses centrally placed masts (like cell phone towers) to transmit high-speed internet across towns and the countryside.

    In order to transmit over a really large area of land, the WiMAX towers are allowed to operate at power levels way above those of WiFi masts. And the Internet receiver units, which are inside your laptop or computer, emit microwaves at up to twice the power level of Wi-Fi.

    So, if we already know that WiFi is really bad for you and is making thousands of kids sick, what do you think WiMAX is going to do to us?

    Many universities have already installed WiMAX across their campus – so where the heck are we going to go (when we get old enough)? At least there is one university that has banned WiFi – I guess their director has a degree in Biology so he understands the science better.

    Lastly, here’s a really good article from a South African health magazine about the dangers of wireless – give this to all the adults you know! And don’t miss our Mum’s teleseminar on WiFi Safety & Protection with radiation expert Dr. Magda Havas.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.