PG&E Attempts to Muzzle Incriminating Details Emerging from Widening Smart Meter Spy Scandal

PG&E's proposed redactions in the CPUC investigative report make it fairly obvious that their entire senior management team- at the very least- knew about the identity falsification and spying and did nothing to prevent it

 CPUC Investigation Reveals that Senior Execs Knew About- and Condoned  Spying on Stop Smart Meters! and EMF Safety Network

SAN FRANCISCO – While public anger continues to simmer over the imposition of illegal[1] and extortionate smart meter ‘opt out’ fees that continue to be hotly disputed at the California Public Utilities Commission, a CPUC Administrative Law Judge is set to decide this Friday July 13th how to respond to a Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) protective order attempting to seal details of how the head of PG&E’s entire SmartMeter program- along with the top management of PG&E- infiltrated and spied on health advocacy groups opposed to the new meters nearly two years ago.

In the Autumn of 2010, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, the largest utility in the country, was rolling out the first major U.S. smart meter deployment in California, and facing a tsunami of public opposition.  Responding to widespread reports of health issues following installation, overcharging, and alarm about privacy violations, local governments were scrambling to pass laws prohibiting smart meters[2], and protest groups were successfully blockading installation yards in Sonoma and Santa Cruz Counties. It appeared that what was going on in California might be putting the utility industry’s entire “smart grid” plans at risk (and by many accounts- it is).  Executives responsible for the program were under an incredible amount of pressure to derail growing protests, cover up flaws in the project and prevent the facts about cheap, untested meters, electrical fires, health damage, privacy violations, and inaccurate billing- from spreading, putting at risk billions of profits to utility shareholders.

Instead of working with community groups to identify and correct hazards, top PG&E executives decided to spy on their “opponents.” William Devereaux was the Senior Director of PG&E’s smart meter program and the public face of Smart Meters in California between October 2009 and November 2010.  He appeared at many community and local government meetings throughout PG&E’s service territory, vouching for the safety and benefits of PG&E’s smart meters.   According to the CPUC’s Investigation on the Commission’s Own Motion into the Operations and Practices of Pacific Gas and Electric Company regarding Anti-Smart Meter Consumer Groups[3], Devereaux posed as Ralph Florea, an anti-smart meter protester.  He began to spy on anti-smart meter groups in September 2010, forwarding private e-mails from activists and suggesting to other PG&E executives that they sign up for the private discussion lists as activists also.  Finally, on Nov. 4th, 2010 Devereaux’s deceit was discovered when he tried to join a state-wide anti-smart meter coalition e-mail group, and his e-mail program betrayed his true identity.   At the time, Devereaux was attempting to access a private forum dedicated to discussing strategy surrounding the EMF Safety Network’s legal proceeding- opposing SmartMeters on public health grounds at the CPUC, a position that has been backed up by physicians groups such as the American Academy of Environmental Medicine[4].  Devereaux admitted to the spying, resigned from his position at PG&E, and now works for Oracle as VP of Industry Strategy, where spying on the customers is apparently considered a career boost.

PG&E also hired the Edelman Group- a corporate security firm- to spy on activists including Josh Hart Director of Stop Smart Meters!  PG&E employees and contractors referred to these community groups in e-mails as “slackers” and “insurgents.”  Another said, “This is fun.  No one said espionage in the job description.”  After a smart meter installation yard was shut down by mass protests in Santa Cruz County for more than a year after PG&E shied away from ordering arrests, one executive comments:

“no coffee and donuts.” (apparently police and arrests) “We will give them the platform they are looking for if we do that.”

The last thing that PG&E wanted was more press coverage to be given to anti-smart meter protesters, because of the evidence they possess that smart meters pose an urgent health and safety hazard.  Ironically, that’s exactly what PG&E has handed them by infiltrating their groups.

Many of the executives who were found complicit in the spying continue to occupy top management positions within PG&E, a fact the company is seeking to suppress with its protection order.  PG&E’s lawyers are arguing that the safety of the executives will be put at risk if they are publicly identified in the CPUC report.  The company’s motion for protection order states:

“Throughout the roll-out of PG&E’s SmartMeter™ program, PG&E’s employees, contractors and some customers have been subjected to escalating threats and particular threatened or actual acts of violence by anti-SmartMeter™ protestors….Based on…the history of hostility and risk of harm, the public interest in the safety of PG&E employees outweighs the public interest that would be served by public disclosure of individual names.”

No evidence to back up these claims was provided by PG&E or their lawyers.  In response, Joshua Hart, Director of Stop Smart Meters! stated: “PG&E is attempting to distract from the illegal and deceitful acts of its top executives, people in public positions who are relied upon to provide safe and reliable utility service. The only violence has been carried out by PG&E and other utilities, who have threatened, coerced, lied, trespassed, and assaulted the residents of this state with unwanted, invasive and badly designed technology.  PG&E’s executives have more to fear from the smart meter on the side of their home than any peaceful protestor. Though we hear that many PG&E employees are in fact opting to keep their analog meters- for free.  An apparent company perk.”

Privacy and civil liberties advocates are watching this case and asking if we can’t trust the utility industry not to read our e-mails and spy on us, how can we trust them not to share details of our private lives that they acquire from the smart meter?”

Consumer groups and those opposed to smart meters say they will be watching carefully to see whether the CPUC releases full, unredacted copies of e-mails showing misconduct, particularly those that reveal how CPUC staff were involved with the spying, what they knew and when. To date, only heavily redacted documents have been released to the public by the utility and the regulatory agency.  The documents did include private e-mails that PG&E obtained through their spying, further angering the victims of the infiltration.

A hearing at the CPUC is scheduled for this Friday, July 13th 2012 at 1:30pm. ALJ Vieth will decide whether to approve PG&E’s “protection order” sealing the executives’ identities and details of the spying activities. California Public Utilities Commission 505 Van Ness Ave. San Francisco  The Public and Press are free to attend.  Following the hearing, representatives of the anti-smart meter groups which were affected by PG&E’s infiltration will make a statement to the press.

Update July 14th: At the hearing yesterday, a documentary filmmaker as well as PBS Newshour were denied the right to film the proceedings.  Judge Vieth pressured PG&E’s lawyers to withdraw their redaction requests and the name of Greg Kiraly, Devereaux’s former boss, was made public.  Kiraly knew about the spying and appears to have been directly involved.  No wonder he looked pale when we had lunch with him a couple of months after the scandal broke in the news!  Stop Smart Meters! demands that Kiraly, and all executives involved in this deceit, resign immediately.  Judge Vieth indicated that she and Commissioner Florio will rule on PG&E’s protective order in writing, shortly.  We will report that decision on this website as soon as it is announced, and continue to cover these hearings as they continue into the fall.

New evidence of PG&E’s wrongdoing is sure to surface.

More info:

PG&E Protection Order and Redacted CPUC Investigation

PG&E’s Lying and Spying May Cost Them

http://stopsmartmeters.org/2012/04/26/pges-lying-and-spying-may-cost-them/

PG&E Opt Out Fees “Suspended”

http://stopsmartmeters.org/2012/04/25/cpuc-pge-smart-meter-opt-out-fees-suspended/

San Francisco Chronicle Coverage

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/04/28/BUHI1O944E.DTL

San Jose Mercury Coverage

http://www.mercurynews.com/pge/ci_20481577/pge-employee-who-spied-activists-support-management-cpuc

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook

This entry was posted in California, Citizen rebellion, CPUC, health effects, Installer Threats and Assaults, PG&E, Privacy, San Francisco, Santa Cruz County, Smart Grid. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to PG&E Attempts to Muzzle Incriminating Details Emerging from Widening Smart Meter Spy Scandal

  1. Treyinia says:

    In Texas, there was a recent lawsuit filed against Apple and a bunch of smartphone “app” makers because their “apps” were secretly stealing the phone’s Address Book data and sending it back to the “app” makers. The main concepts addressed were invasion of privacy and theft of data.

    Here in Texas, the Utilities Code states unequivocally that the data from the smart meter belongs to the customer, so many of the legal concepts in the “apps” lawsuit are the same for the theft of smart meter data.

    Also in the “apps” lawsuit are references to California laws about privacy, theft of data, and similar legal concepts that also very much apply to smart meter data. I didn’t pay much attention to them because they don’t pertain to me in Texas, but they might very well lead you guys in California to the ability for individual or even class action lawsuits.

    Here is a copy of the document:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/85310203/TX-US-District-Court-Class-Action

    See bottom of page 19. To find other references to California law, use text search and look for “California” (without quotes).

  2. Pingback: PG&E Attempts to Suppress Incriminating Details Emerging from Widening Smart Meter Spy Scandal | Fairfield Safe Meters

  3. Pingback: Smart Meter News Briefs – July 28, 2012 | michiganstopsmartmeters

  4. Pingback: Quick Hits « bobsbox

  5. Pingback: PG&E Attempts to Muzzle Incriminating Details Emerging from Widening Smart Meter Spy Scandal | Sovereign Independent UK

  6. Pingback: PG&E Attempts to Muzzle Incriminating Details Emerging from Widening Smart Meter Spy Scandal « Stop Making Sense

  7. Marla Lee says:

    Electric theft is rampant in Fresno, CA – behind water scam. City(s) rebuilt on top of the secretly-replaced / relocated water system; utility poles relocated followed by altered records to make it appear nothing changed. With outsiders “planted” and rewarded to participate then lie about what is taking place, electric theft appears to be part of the reward as victims continue blaming Smart Meters. PG&E verifies nothing is wrong with the Smart Meters – but neither will they look into electric theft. “Not their job.” “Nothing being stolen from them, it is stolen from their customers.”
    With such close monitoring of victims, evidence is quickly rectified as reports are made – whereby victim is told “without evidence we cannot help you.” Can’t they check surrounding records or a specific address of who is “allegedly” behind the theft? No – everyone is protected under “Disclosure Laws.”

  8. DarkStarAz says:

    Smart meters will make easy indoor grower detection…

  9. Pingback: PG&E Attempts to Muzzle Incriminating Details Emerging from Widening Smart Meter Spy Scandal | Fairfield Safe Meters

  10. Pingback: PG&E Attempts to Muzzle Incriminating Details Emerging on Smart Meter Spy Scandal - ALIPAC

  11. Pingback: Smart Grid Industry Still Full of Deceit | Stop Smart Meters!

  12. Ilatoc says:

    We are having a smart meter installed at work next week. Tried sooo hard not to let it happen but apparently its compulsory for small businesses in UK to have one installed by 2014. Managed to delay it for about 6 months though no colleagues had even heard of smart meters let alone the health implications so it was rather like bashing my head against a brick wall. When i called the company installing it to ask about health issues etc i was told that ‘there are no health issues as it just uses mobile technology’. The very same technology that feels like my brain is being fried after talking on my mobile (cell phone) for longer than 2 mins. Fingers crossed it wont affect me otherwise i will certainly be quitting my job!

  13. they all knew they could spy on us and they will continue to do it if we dont stop them now! please join us in the fight against this! pauline holetonnn shelby twp mich http://www.w4ar.com will always fight. please join us on our conference call 1st and 3rd su nday from 6 to 730 eastern time. allot of people call from all over the world! you will learn allot. 1559 546 1000 pin is 172142. please join us this sunday august 19th 2012. pauline holeton 586 731 3314 remember http://www.w4ar.com for more info!

  14. Pingback: Is Going Off the Grid Practical? :

  15. Pingback: Is Going Off the Grid Practical? - Montana Steam Power Inc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>