Stop Smart Meters! Sacramento Challenges SMUG SMUD

attachment

Stop Smart Meters! Sacramento: Putting the Community Back in Community Power

SACRAMENTO, CA– Resistance to smart meter deployments can vary tremendously, depending on local circumstances.  Sometimes a local population is informed, organized and resistant to a smart meter deployment before the men in uniforms and white trucks arrive like some old episode from the Twilight Zone, barging into people’s backyards and installing devices that make people sick.

Other times, little attention is given to the quiet, but pervasive ‘meter upgrade’ until problems start cropping up.

That’s the case in Sacramento, California where 99.9995% of households have now been installed with smart meters by the local municipal utility SMUD.  Only when people started connecting the dots between a variety of sudden health problems and the recently installed metering mesh networks did a local group get organized and start applying pressure, attending meetings and speaking out.

According to Eric Windheim, Director of Stop Smart Meters! Sacramento, and an owner of an environmental health business who founded the group in May 2012:

“At first it was only a couple of us. But every meeting more people are coming out of the woodwork who have been hurt by smart meters and want them off their homes.  All we want is safe, clean electricity delivered through a proven safe analog meter from a utility that tells the truth.  Is that too much to ask?”

Picture 3Apparently it is.  SMUD has lied about the number of daily smart meter pulses, and ridiculed those with serious, doctor verified health damage from smart meters. SMUD published statements that “smart meters send radio transmissions only once every four hours” but Stop Smart Meters! Sacramento forced them to admit the truth- that SMUD Smart Meters in fact emit 13,381 transmissions per day on the average, according to industry documents.

The SMUD lie was off by over 2,230%.

It tells you something when a utility has to lie about the facts in order to get people to believe that something is safe.

Now SMUD is being bombarded by thousands of angry residents who want their smart meters off and analog meters back.  SMUD has been forced to schedule a workshop this Thursday, February 21st (5:45-9pm 6201 S Street if you want to go) to deal with growing smart meter complaints from the public. Two outside national “experts” will speak for SMUD for the first hour.  The public has 90 minutes- 3 people who sign up on SMUD’s website in advance will have up to 10 minutes each and everyone else gets 5 minutes- or 3 minutes if its crowded.

Sources familiar with SMUD on the smart meter issue say, “expect professional discourtesy.”  They don’t like to hear that they are killing your grandma.   SMUD is also doing everything possible to make it difficult, including the installation of new “crowd control”  measures in the Board Room (see below).

The escalating smart meter drama at SMUD meetings reached a new level in October when a woman named Rosa P. came and spoke directly to SMUD’s board about her suffering from the bank of dozens of smart meters installed on the wall of her apartment. She told the Directors about her constant bloody noses whenever she was at home, near the smart meters. Though many had described their symptoms, the board members just didn’t seem to get it. So Rosa brought her blood-soaked nightgown to the meeting in a plastic bag, and placed it on the overhead projector, to show SMUD directors what effect smart meter radiation is having on her life.  The macabre show and tell had its desired effect.  As Rosa’s bloodied nightgown filled the screen, the blood drained from the faces of the board members.

Are they starting to realize what they are responsible for?

One Director- Genevieve Shiroma- was particularly shocked, and said to Eric after the meeting:

“Mr. Windheim, No more bloody rags!”

Eric Windheim  replied:

“Those are not rags.  This is Rosa’s nightgown and she’s standing right there.”

Director Shiroma just said:

“Take her to a doctor…”

For 2013, SMUD has changed its policy- not to allow no-cost ‘opt outs’ – but to prohibit members of the public from using the overhead projector at meetings.  Though the directors seem to have been shaken by the sight of blood, it hasn’t seemed to soften their smart meter policies, or make it any easier to get the devices off your home.  Twilight Zone indeed.

SMUD claims authority to examine and censor any visual material the public will present 48 hours before Thursday’s workshop but they have not offered to share their visual images in advance with the public.

Remember, this is the same utility whose director was caught on tape joking that “these people” could afford to buy ‘tin foil hats’ to protect them from the radiation.

Despite the challenges, Eric and his group have been persistent advocates for those harmed by smart meters in Sacramento.  It has not always been easy.  Just this month a promising newspaper article authorized by the owner of the paper with interviews of Eric and several others was to be published but as soon as the reporter contacted SMUD for some clarifications the article was canned.  Last year a local TV station agreed to run a series of reports on Smart Meter Problems but SMUD threatened the station according to the person who was going to be interviewed.

Is SMUD violating the First Amendment to the Constitution? “Infringing upon the freedom of the press”? “Abridging the freedom of speech”?

Eric has been “body blocked” by SMUD staffers as he was trying to speak with the General Manager about a legal issue, and the group has been threatened that if they spread the word, and a lot more people ‘opt out’ the fee will rise for everyone.  In other words, be grateful for what you have and shut up.

SSM! Sacramento is not shutting up.  In the last several months they have distributed more than a thousand flyers, attended dozens of events, and recently packed Eric’s house with 23 people on short notice to hear from an RF expert coming through town and talk about what to do about SMUD.

The ‘opt out’ fees and punitive policies have been particularly harsh.  SMUD initially tried to charge people $127 and $39.40/month for a “non-transmitting” digital smart meter (the kind that has been associated with dirty-electricity related health impacts). Now- trying to defuse a growing public revolt- they’ve lowered their digital “non-transmitting” meter fee to $14/ month, but are refusing to allow people to retain their analog meters, threatening several- including Eric- with electricity disconnection.

Nationally, it’s shaping up that municipal utilities seem to be some of the worst perpetrators. Perhaps because local government authority combined with control of utility services concentrates power and invites corruption.  We have certainly seen this in places like the City of Naperville (CON).  Though SMUD has not used police escort to force smart meters on homes yet, they have deployed half a dozen armed officers at meetings- some say to intimidate the increasing number of sickened SMUD customers coming forward.

Lesson learned is that localization of public services is a worthwhile goal, but make sure you don’t go from the frying pan into the fire:  your local government board may be worse than the company shareholders they are intended to replace.

In advance of Thursday’s meeting, a 2.5′ steel barrier has been installed to keep the public behind the second row of seats in the boardroom and away from the SMUD directors and staff.  SSM! Sacramento includes members with hearing disabilities, and so has typically been sitting in the front row in order to hear what is said.  Now SMUD has decided to move everyone back to the third row, behind the new heavy steel barrier.  An apt symbol for the soured, increasingly entrenched relations between utilities and the public.

According to SMUD:

“Because this is a workshop and not a Board meeting, speakers will be allowed to use the overhead projector if requested 48 hours in advance of the workshop. All slides must be submitted to SMUD 48 hours in advance of the workshop. Requests to use the overhead projector and materials should be provided by email to Erik.Krause@smud.org”

Afraid of the sight of a little blood, SMUD?

Info from SSM! Sacramento's flyer (note-links are not clickable)

Info from SSM! Sacramento’s flyer (note-links are not clickable)

Important Upcoming Meetings to Speak Out and Stop Smart Meters!:

1)    Sacramento Smart Meter Meeting:

       Thurs. Feb. 21  5:45-9pm 6201 S Street, Sacramento (SMUD)

2)    California Public Utilities Commission Meeting:

       Thurs. Feb. 28 8:45am 505 Van Ness, SF (PG$E, SDG$E, $SCE$)

Download pdf of SSM! Sacramento’s Flyer here: Smart Meter Workshop Flyer

If you want to come and speak, please do – you can contact Eric Windheim, Director of Stop Smart Meters! Sacramento @ 919-395-7336 to coordinate.

To support Stop Smart Meters! Sacramento: send donations to Stop Smart Meters! Attn: Sacramento SSM!  Donations will help offset printing and office costs associated with organizing resistance to SMUD’s smart meter policies.  We thank you.

Picture 1

Posted in California, Citizen rebellion, Democracy, health effects, neighborhood organizing, radio-frequency radiation, Sacramento, Smart Grid | 13 Comments

Important Reminder: Don’t Kill the Love — Keep Microwave Radiation Away from Your Bits

Posted in Cell phones, health effects, radio-frequency radiation | 1 Comment

Smart Meter Protesters Confront Al Gore in SF

(From last night’s protest at Al Gore’s speaking gig in San Francisco- organized by No Smart Meters SF)

Posted in California, Citizen rebellion, Environmental Concerns, health effects, San Francisco, Smart Grid | 4 Comments

Disabled Woman’s Power Restored After Public Outcry in Ohio

Coverage from The Blaze:

“A handicapped woman in western Ohio has to battle the freezing winter weather this (last) weekend because she refused to allow the local power company to install a “smart meter” on her property.

Brenda Hawk has a pacemaker for her heart and because her brain was injured in a car accident, she requires a breathing machine in order to sleep at night. She does not want the new radio-frequency emitting meter because of the health problems these devices have been said to cause. But American Electric Power AEP-Ohio, the local power company, has persisted in their push to swap out Hawk’s analog meter and replace it with the new one.”

Read full story here: http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/02/09/handicapped-woman-refuses-smart-meter-has-power-cut-in-the-dead-of-winter/

Posted in Citizen rebellion, Ohio, Police, radio-frequency radiation, Safety | 3 Comments

Maine Smart Meter Opponents File Testimony in Health Case

Picture 1DSCN0267

From MaineCoalitiontoStopSmartMeters.Org

PORTLAND- In Maine’s ongoing PUC investigation into the safety of smart meters, opponents turned up the heat this week on Central Maine Power (CMP). Complainants in the case filed their comprehensive expert and lay witness testimony with the Maine Public Utilities Commission (PUC). The submissions detail biological and health effects from radiofrequency or microwave radiation (RF) and smart meters.

In his cover letter to the PUC, Bruce McGlaufin of the Portland firm of Petrucelli, Martin and Haddow representing smart meter opponents, noted the comprehensive lay witness testimonies and declarations “provide compelling evidence of the direct adverse health effects related to the radio frequency radiation transmitted by smart meters.” McGlauflin added: “When this direct evidence of real-life human consequences is evaluated together with the expert testimony of some of the most highly qualified scientists and public policy specialists, there is but one conclusion to reach-smart meters pose a significant health risk.”

All of the independent scientists providing testimony for meter opponents are recognized authorities on low-level biological effects of RF or related public health matters. Collectively they have hundreds of peer-reviewed published journal articles to their credit. Experts for the complainants include Dr. Lennart Hardell of Sweden, the world’s foremost authority on cell phone induced brain tumors and author of over 300 papers on RF issues; Dr. Jerry Phillips, Director of the Center for Excellence in Science, an expert on how low-level RF effects DNA and also expert on the often misused “weight of evidence” approach to evaluating research. Dr. Dariusz Leszczynski of Finland who served on the International Agency for Research on Cancer with Dr. Hardell is another expert who has authored 90 papers and has developed highly specialized screening techniques for transcriptomic and proteotomic analyses showing cell phone effects on gene and protein expression.

In sharp contrast, witnesses for CMP are hardly published in this field, and are employed by Exponent, a renowned “product protection” firm making its fortune defending products like tobacco, asbestos, benzene and MTBE. Exponent is featured in the book Doubt is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health by epidemiologist and former Assistant Secretary of Energy for Environment, Safety and Health, David Michaels.

“While we have submitted comprehensive, irrefutable, compelling and often tragic testimony” said Ed Friedman, lead complainant in the case, “the fact is the legal burden of proof is on CMP and the PUC to guarantee smart meters are safe, not on us to prove they are not. While the PUC may find there is conflicting evidence on the subject of low-level effects of RF, they still could not meet their statutory requirement to guarantee safety.”

Friedman calls for the complete removal of all smart meters and a return to safe and long-lasting electromechanical meters noting “most possible alternatives shy of this remain unsafe.”

Recent testimony submitted by Maine’s Office of Public Advocate showed several Maine smart meter RF levels below those of the FCC guidelines. “No surprise there,” said Kathleen McGee a complainant in the case adding “the report is as irrelevant as the obsolete government exposure guidelines. Indeed, adverse health effects are occurring at levels lower than the FCC limits. That is our point, well-illustrated by the plain, simple and incontrovertible facts shown in our submitted evidence.”

Richard Conrad, a Ph.D. biochemist is another expert and brought his dual perspective as a research scientist and sufferer of electrical sensitivity to designing a survey investigating possible correlations between smart meters and health effects. There were over two hundred survey respondents from around the world. Some significant survey conclusions are that 82% of respondents were in good or excellent health before smart meters and 42% of them developed symptoms prior to any knowledge a smart meter was present (thereby disproving the psychosomatic label industry has tagged smart meter victims with). Before smart meter installation 32% had some electrical sensitivity and this jumped to nearly 68% following smart meter installation. 99% of respondents were very sure (82%) or fairly (17%) sure their symptoms (tinnitus, insomnia, headaches, heart arrhythmias, cognitive difficulties, etc.) were initiated or worsened by smart meters.

A look at survey comments submitted by many respondents tells a story of devastation said Conrad. “Many respondents were forced from their homes, are unable to work anymore and in a constant state of chronic debilitating ill-health following smart meter exposure or installation. Exposure to smart meters has destroyed the ability of many respondents to function normally in their personal and work lives.”

Survey results and other testimony are available on the Maine PUC website and within a few days should be available on the Maine Coalition to Stop Smart Meters website at www.mainecoalitiontostopsmartmeters.org .

Dianne Wilkins, Coalition organizer, intervenor in this investigation and former complainant in an earlier smart meter case before the PUC had this to say:

“Smart meters threaten our health, our privacy, our security and in no small way our human rights, democracy, dignity and way of life. Smart meters are one of the largest uncontrolled toxic biological experiments of our time. An experiment sanctioned by Maine legislators on unsuspecting and trusting citizens, citizens who are getting ill just going home, making dinner, going to bed; living. Their deployment is unconscionable.”

Posted in health effects, Health studies, legal issues, Maine, radio-frequency radiation | 2 Comments