Take Back Your Power: Transformational Film of the Year!

Screen Shot 2014-02-02 at 11.36.51 AMWe here at Stop Smart Meters! are quite fond of the film “Take Back Your Power” to say the least.  It has transformed the movement against “smart” meters, laid bare the horrific truth about the “smart” grid, and galvanized resistance against the centralized utility model of power distribution.  We are happy to report that Take Back Your Power has won the AwareGuide 2013 Transformational Film of the Year Award thanks to your efforts and a viral online voting campaign.   Take Back Your Power shares the top spot with the animal rights film, Ghosts in Our Machine, another critical and timely exposé.

Posted in Citizen rebellion, Democracy, neighborhood organizing, Smart Grid | Leave a comment

Getting from ‘Smart’ to Wise: SF Panel Set to Plot New Course

From Ecological Options Network:
This post encourages you to check out the landmark report “Getting Smarter About the Smart Grid,” authored by energy expert Dr. Timothy Schoechle, published by the National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy – and to sign up to attend The High (?) Road to a True Smart Grid, a Commonwealth Club of San Francisco program scheduled for January 28th, noon to 3 pm.

In order to create a resilient and sustainable future it’s imperative to explore the best alternative electricity generation and distribution forms. Our current electrical system is the source of much sickness, pollution, injustice and instability in this age of climate change and extreme weather. Our outmoded electrical grid needs to be re-engineered and soon!

Come to this important panel at the San Francisco Commonwealth Club and hear this vitally hopeful discussion. The panelists will outline a blueprint for a healthier, safer and smarter approach to both electricity generation and distribution in the United States—one that has all of our best interests, and the interests of planet Earth, at heart.


Panel Members (L to R) James Turner, Esq., Timothy D. Schoechle, PhD., Camilla R. G. Rees, MBA, Duncan Campbell, Esq., Dr. Karl Maret

In addition to Dr. Schoechle, others on the January 28th Commonwealth Club panel, moderated by Camilla Rees, MBA, include engineer and physician, Karl Maret, MD, of Aptos, CA; new energy visionary, and radio host, Duncan Campbell, Esq. of Boulder, CO, author of the white paper “New Energy for a New World”; and attorney Jim Turner, Esq, Partner of Swankin & Turner in Washington, D.C., co-author of “Voice of the People: The Transpartisan Imperative in American Life” and Chairman of the National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy.

by James Heddle and Mary Beth Brangan

30897200solarrooftops

Solar rooftops stretch to the horizon in Germany. This could be the microgrid future that Investor Owned Utilities (aptly termed IOUs) fear.

Getting to Wise
It’s starting to look like yesterday’s ‘smart’ is today’s ‘really stupid.’

The over-used term ‘smart’ – applied to everything from phones to drones, and everything in between – seems to be turning from a marketing advantage into a stark warning label.

Take the plans for a wirelessly-managed national system of energy networks – the so-called ‘smart grid’ – based on the country-wide blanket deployment of wireless so-called ‘smart meters.

Our work, and that of many others, has shown that, not only would such a system vastly increase the damaging public health effects of electromagnetic radiation pollution, but it would permit granular surveillance of every household, and make not only each home, but the entire grid itself, vulnerable to malicious or terrorist hacking.

“A Really, Really Stupid Grid”

The Security Issue
No one would argue that the existing U.S. energy grid – an aging, outmoded infrastructure increasingly insecure in the face of proliferating extreme weather events and escalating cyber attacks – does not need to be radically re-engineered. Even former CIA Director James Woolsey famously stated in a 2011 TV interview, “There is no one in charge of security for the grid…A so-called ‘smart grid’ that is as vulnerable as what we’ve got is not smart at all. It’s a really, really stupid grid.”

The Surveillance Issue
Another, more recent, former CIA director agrees. The Daily Mail reports that, In the view of David Petraeus, “…web-connected gadgets will ‘transform’ the art of spying – allowing spies to monitor people automatically without planting bugs, breaking and entering or even donning a tuxedo to infiltrate a dinner party.”

‘Transformational’ is an overused word, but I do believe it properly applies to these technologies,’ said Petraeus.

‘Particularly to their effect on clandestine tradecraft. Items of interest will be located, identified, monitored, and remotely controlled through technologies such as radio-frequency identification, sensor networks, tiny embedded servers, and energy harvesters – all connected to the next-generation internet using abundant, low-cost, and high-power computing.’

An ‘Internet of Things,’ Bots, Algorithms, Corporations and… Big Brother

The Hacking Issue
The spy guys’ views are borne out in the recent CNN report, Connected TVs, fridge help launch global cyberattack. It tells how wirelessly connected “smart” household appliances such as routers, televisions and at least one refrigerator, were recently used in a massive global cyber attack to launch malicious emails, spam and phishing.

Commenting on the CNN report, author and electro-magnetic pollution expert Blake Levitt had this to say: “Highly recommend that anyone buying new appliances/household electronics makes sure they are not ‘smart’ 2-way enabled with embedded antennas. If enough people refuse to buy them, perhaps this will begin to implode. Not only is the RF component dangerous but the appliances themselves are easily hacked. Until this recent hacking, it was thought that only the meters were vulnerable as potential portals into the entire grid. This entire approach needs to be completely re-thought and re-engineered.”

The ‘Smart’ Meter Issue
Dr. Timothy Schoechle, the author of Getting Smarter About the Smart Grid, has been engaged in development of electric utility meters, home automation systems, gateways, and energy management systems for over 25 years and sits on several international standards setting committees related to the smart grid and to home and building automation systems.

Schoechle calls the smart meters being rolled out across the U.S. “a canard—a story or hoax based on specious claims about energy benefits….” He goes on to explain how state and local governments, and environmental organizations, have been misled about the purported benefits of ‘smart’ meters.
His paper addresses how ‘smart’ meter investments, using billions in stimulus funding, do not benefit ratepayers or support economic growth, but financially prop up unsustainable Investor-Owned-Utilities (IOUs), while postponing investment in genuine ‘smart’ technical solutions and the inevitable transition to a decentralized and democratized electricity system.

Dr. Karl Maret, engineer and MD, will be speaking on the Commonwealth Club panel. He points out that since microwave emitting Smart Meters were installed as part of the Automated Metering Infrastructure (AMI) upgrade by utilities in California and elsewhere, numerous health complaints have been reported, especially by electrically hypersensitive individuals.

Dr. Maret’s talk as part of the Commonwealth Club panel on the Smart Grid will address concerns of potential health challenges from electromagnetic fields in our current increasingly wireless society and how Smart Meters are adding an additional layer of non-thermal electromagnetic environmental exposure that hasn’t been studied prior their deployment. This may have important long-term health implications for our society.

In her article WHO KNEW? – The Wireless Smart Meter Meltdown, electro-magnetic pollution protection consultant Cindy Sage puts it this way,

… [snip] The smart meter program is widely seen as a spying, snooping, expensive, potentially hazardous, involuntary and entirely unnecessary burden for which energy conservation is a mirage. [snip]
….. It is really quite stunning how a single failed corporate/governmental strategy could backfire so rapidly and so completely.”

A Dying Business Model – So-o-o 20th Century!
Currently the U.S. grid is one of the lowest-rated national energy grids among all industrialized countries. But there are increasing signs that the whole business design of the system – dominated as it is by giant centralized and politically powerful monopoly investor-owned utilities (IOUs) – is itself out-dated.

The ‘Smart’ meter network craze is standing revealed as one of the last big mistakes of a dying centralized business model.

Writes Schoechle,

“The 100 year-old monopoly utility business model contains inherent conflicts and is de- incentivized from taking the necessary steps toward renewable energy and sustainability. Regulated utilities sell electricity as a commodity at profitable regulated rates and, more importantly, can charge back their capital assets to ratepayers at a guaranteed 10-13% annual rate of return. Thus they have no incentive to sell less electricity, yet a strong incentive to build excessive and inappropriate infrastructure (e.g., generation, transmission, meter networks, etc.).”

Schoechle points out that billions of dollars of smart utility meters are being installed across America that are unable to integrate with, or enable, the smart grid of the future on which U.S. energy sustainability depends in his landmark report “Getting Smarter About the Smart Grid,” published by the National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy. The meter network has been called a colossal waste of taxpayer and ratepayer dollars by critics, who argue that the new meters and networks do not improve energy efficiency, enhance energy management, help balance supply and demand, or facilitate the integration of renewable sources.

[ See Schoechle’s review of Power Struggle: The Hundred-Year War over Electricity.By Richard Rudolph and Scott Ridley here and his paper “Modular power manager and gateway: an approach to home-to-grid energy management and demand response” here.

“It has become increasingly clear that the fundamental architecture of today’s electricity grid, which is based on the idea of a top down radial transmission system predicated on unidirectional energy flows from large centralized power plants, is obsolete.” That’s the informed opinion of energy consultant Peter Asmus.

Writing in Forbes, Business Energy and other publications, Asmus, a senior energy researcher and author, shares his conclusion that the future grid design will be based on distributed energy generation (DEG) based on small-scale renewable sources organized in local ‘micro grids’ that can either be integrated into, or ‘islanded’ out of larger grid systems. Says Asmus, “If, indeed, the electricity grid begins to resemble the Internet due to the proliferation of DEG, then aggregation platforms, such as the microgrid, will become vital.”

For another interesting discussion of ‘wise’ energy strategies – and his advocacy of the micro-grid for its ability to be ‘fractally separated or seamlessly integrated, as needed’ – see Amory Lovins’ TED talk A 40-year plan for energy and his Reinventing Fire website.

AC/DC
Another component of the energy transition may be a switch from alternating current (AC) to direct current (DC), which is what energy sources like solar PV and small-scale wind produce and what electronic devices such as computers use. New strategies and technologies for storage and transmission are overcoming previous economic- and safety-based resistances to a DC-based system. That would be good news for the growing numbers of people becoming electro-sensitive, for it is the conversion of AC to DC via inverters and switched mode power supply (SMPS) that produces much of the electromagnetic pollution from which they suffer. Whether or not we’re conscious of the adverse effects, all humans and other biological systems are impacted by man-made electromagnetic and radiofrequency pollution.

What Would a Truly Wise Grid Look Like?
Decentralized power generation in micro-grids

A truly wise grid would build on new and emerging technologies, design concepts and environmental values and eliminate the risks, vulnerabilities and inefficiencies of the old, obsolete regulatory and business models.

But entrenched, jurassic monopoly IOUs oppose it for obvious existential reasons; i.e.: their business model and their basic profit-making strategy are toast.

Yet there is hope. As Jim Turner puts it, “The automobile, the personal computer and the cell phone all empowered individuals and created massive lucrative markets. The in-home (and car) dispersed energy revolution –from rooftop solar, to small scale wind and hydro and limitless conservation – offers personal empowerment for consumers and gigantic economic opportunity for entrepreneurs and business innovators.”

Duncan Campbell, also a panelist, says in the foreward to Schoechle’s white paper, “At the end or beginning of the day, what it comes down to is simply this: In order to establish an abundant and hospitable world for ourselves and a sustainable and empowering future for all generations, we cannot and need not wait for our formally elected politicians to find the right energy policy. It is time for each of us to stand up for our home, our family, and our planet and to make an end run around the failing archaic centralized grid policy
and the disempowering intrusion of the drone-in-the-home smart meter.”


These are some of the considerations that will be explored in the important up-coming program The High (?) Road to a True Smart Grid at San Francisco’s Commonwealth Club on January 28th presented by National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy. The Institute recently published the landmark report “Getting Smarter About the Smart Grid,” authored by energy expert Dr. Timothy Schoechle.

We have an upcoming radio interview with Timothy Schoechle and Peter Asmus, which will air Mon. Jan. 27 at 1pm on KWMR-FM’s Post-Carbon Radio.

Here’s the program info. Register here.

The High (?) Road to a True Smart Grid
Tue, Jan 28 2014 – 11:30am

Timothy Schoechle, Ph.D., Author, “Getting Smarter About the Smart Grid,” published by the National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy, Washington, D.C.
James S. Turner, Esq., Principal, Swankin & Turner; Board Chair, Citizens for Health; Co-founder, Voice for H.O.P.E., Healers of Planet Earth; Chairman, National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy
Karl Maret, M.D., M.Eng. President, Dove Health Alliance
Duncan A. Campbell, Esq., Colorado Radio Host
Camilla Rees, MBA, Founder, Electromagnetic Health.org and Campaign for Radiation Free Schools – Moderator

Billions of dollars of smart utility meters are being installed across America that are unable to integrate with, or enable, the smart grid of the future on which U.S. energy sustainability depends, according to the landmark report “Getting Smarter About the Smart Grid,” published by the National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy. The meter network has been called a colossal waste of taxpayer and ratepayer dollars by critics, who argue that the new meters and networks do not improve energy efficiency, enhance energy management, help balance supply and demand, or facilitate the integration of renewable sources. The panel will clarify technical misunderstandings about smart meters, the entrenched economic models preventing utilities from fully embracing renewable energy, and how the growing smart meter rebellion may herald a transformation in the political economy of energy. The panelists will describe what they believe it will to take to create a reliable, safe, sustainable electricity grid, with our planetary interests at heart, and how a clean energy economy can be fast tracked through an innovative collaborative financing arrangement between the private and public sectors.
Location: SF Club Office
Time: 11:30 a.m. lunch, 12-3 p.m. program
Cost: $32 non-members, $20 members, $10 students (with valid ID)
Program Organizer: Bill Grant
See more

Posted in California, Changing a Meter, Citizen rebellion, Class Issues and Social Equality, Climate Change, Democracy, Environmental Concerns, Federal Government, Home Area Network, neighborhood organizing, San Francisco, Smart Grid | 3 Comments

WHO KNEW? The Wireless Smart Meter Meltdown

Perspective by Cindy SageThe misguided program of mandatory ‘smart wireless meters’ has done more to undercut the gains in public support for energy conservation in this country than any other single factor. The national shift to embrace energy conservation in the face of climate change has been derailed by mandatory ‘wireless smart meter’ programs. And judging by the public outrage against the National Security Agency (NSA) spying program revealed by Edward Snowden last summer, Americans have come to understand that government mandates for smart meters is likely one more ‘deep drilling project’ on their personal habits, preferences, life styles and medical conditions.

The smart meter program is widely seen as a spying, snooping, expensive, potentially hazardous, involuntary and entirely unnecessary burden for which energy conservation is a mirage. It is unlikely that Americans will stand for public utilities spying on their homes using energy use and conservation as the ruse, and make money on these data by selling their personal information to third party information brokers for profit.

How could one bad idea so completely galvanize such enormous and widespread public resistance? And lead to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) review of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) wireless safety standards and general distrust for government ideas about energy conservation? And undercut public support for some national environmental groups? It is really quite stunning how a single failed corporate/governmental strategy could backfire so rapidly and so completely.

Read full perspctive column at EMF Safety Network

Meltmelted smart meter monster

Posted in California, Cancer, Cell phones, Citizen rebellion, CPUC, Democracy, Electro-Hyper-Sensitivity, Environmental Concerns, EPA, FCC, FDA, Federal Government, Fires, health effects, Health studies, Home Area Network, legal issues, neighborhood organizing, PG&E, Physicians, Privacy, radio-frequency radiation, Safety, SCE, SDG&E, Smart Grid, Time of Use Pricing, Wi-Fi, World Health Organization | 2 Comments

New Video: Public Confronts Tom Wheeler Over Clearly Inadequate RF ‘Guidelines’ at Silicon Valley Speech

(Note- the clip above is updated with higher quality audio and video, and new footage of the protests, courtesy of a woman who is about to go into surgery for a brain tumor, caused by her cell phone- our thoughts and support are with her at this time.)

Almost a week ago, members of the public attending the first speech by new FCC Chair Tom Wheeler in Silicon Valley, rose up in succession and confronted what we see as grossly inadequate public health ‘guidelines’ for RF wireless radiation exposure.

The evidence for that claim?  A rash of cell phone caused brain tumors, electrical sensitivities resulting from exposures to smart meters and other wireless devices, and a history of peer-reviewed science that has systematically been ignored and suppressed by the government, industry, and mainstream media.

How obvious does it have to get?  The man appointed by Obama to lead the agency charged with regulating the wireless industry actually led the wireless industry for 12 years.

Apparently Mr. Obama- and the power structure he represents- thinks the public is stupid.  Well maybe we’re not as stupid as you think, Mr. President.

Resistance to great injustice is inevitable , and the wireless health issue is no exception.    As Greg Caput, in 2010 a council member for Watsonville, one of the first cities in California to pass a law prohibiting ‘smart’ meters, said of the smart meter ‘deployment,’ “you can only push people so far.”  In other words, social upheaval is not linear.  You push past a certain line and people will start to rise up.

If basic, overdue and reasonable reforms like cancer warning labels on cell phones, the establishment of a “white zone” for electro-hyper-sensitive people, a recall of the ‘smart’ grid, and a ban on wireless in K-12 schools is not adopted, it is inevitable that disobedience- even civil unrest- will spread.

The great dam that has held up the lake of denial that wireless is “safe” is daily springing new leaks, crumbling with each new scientific report of health damage.  Yet the government and industry are busy building on top of that unsteady structure, paying for elaborate programs that benefit industry and hurt the public with our own tax dollars.

It has to stop.

Wheeler made it very clear that- like the industry he represents- he sees the elimination of the country’s landline network as inevitable (even though there has been virtually no public consultation about this brutal decimation of our reliable, clear, non-grid dependent and essential emergency network).  It’s like he has a visceral hatred of anything analog, even when these systems work just fine and have for decades.

Mr. Wheeler, remember when you first got into office, your little proposal to allow cell phones on airplanes, how’d that turn out for you?

Though we are learning more about the health impacts of wireless exposure, they now think it’s a nifty idea to make an “internet of things” that will irradiate us all constantly.

What about an “internet of people” that is controlled in the public – not corporate interest and is wired, safe and secure into every home.  Obama and industry puppet Wheeler want to install wi-fi- a Class 2B carcinogen– into every classroom in America though the ConnectEd program.   How can this be seen as anything but a sociopathic, irrational and dangerous attack on our children?  It’s something so simple- as a Danish 9th grade class found out when they exposed cress seeds to a wi-fi routerthey don’t sprout into healthy adults.   The scary thing is- neither may our children if the ConnectEd program goes ahead.

Let’s make sure our next generation don’t turn out like the sprouts on the right.

2014 will be a year of action against the wireless industry.  From where we’re sitting, it’s inevitable.  There’s something about being lied to, and then given a brain tumor by an uncaring multi- trillion dollar  industry that makes people a little upset.   Getting arrested suddenly becomes quite a mild proposition, given what we are facing.

Let’s find those cracks in the dam- and with love, respect, and reasonableness, bash the hell away at them until the torrent pushes through and the dam crumbles.  The power is not in Washington with these corrupt ‘leaders.’  The power is in us- in our hearts- in our communities- and in our hands.  And they know it.

Posted in California, Cancer, Cell phones, Citizen rebellion, Democracy, Electro-Hyper-Sensitivity, FCC, Federal Government, health effects, interference, landlines, neighborhood organizing, Obama, radio-frequency radiation, Safety, Santa Clara County, Smart Grid, Wi-Fi, World Health Organization | 6 Comments

Josh Hart Speaks on Wireless Safety at Oakland Event

New FCC Chair Tom Wheeler came to Oakland, CA to take part in a town hall meeting on Thursday Jan. 9th called “Voices for Internet Freedom.”  Tom is not your “brother” and he does not “have your back”  He led the wireless industry for 12 years and has fought to hide unfavorable science showing brain tumors in cell phone users.  He is deep in bed with Verizon, AT&T, and all the other large corporate interests who are making a killing off of killing you and me.

It’s time to show these foxes guarding the hen house- men who are working to damage the public interest that they supposedly represent- that we will not quietly go along with their “smart” agenda.

Posted in California, Cancer, Cell phones, Citizen rebellion, Class Issues and Social Equality, CPUC, Democracy, FCC, Federal Government, health effects, landlines, neighborhood organizing, Oakland, Obama, radio-frequency radiation, Wi-Fi, World Health Organization | 3 Comments