City of Fort Collins Colorado Rubs Salt in the Wounds of Radiation- Damaged, Bereaved Family

Craig and Virginia Farver stand outside their Fort Collins, CO home where their municipal utility forced a smart meter on their home, backed by police 3 weeks ago

Craig and Virginia Farver stand outside their Fort Collins, CO home where their municipal utility forced a smart meter backed by police three weeks ago

The first stop on our WhistleStop Smart Meters! tour is Fort Collins, Colorado, where Virginia Farver lives with her husband Craig.  Their son Rich Farver died from a brain tumor in 2008 – part of a cancer cluster that they attribute to radiation from smart grid related antennas at San Diego State University.  Rich’s Glioblastoma brain tumor was part of a significant cancer cluster surrounding room 131 of Nasatir Hall at the University.  The room has since been converted to storage and the windows taped up though the university has stayed mum about the radiation risk on campus.

Stop Smart Meters! can reveal that the wireless system that was implicated in causing Rich’s death from a brain tumor was likely operating above already loose FCC guidelines for radiation exposure as early as 2002.   An article from Computerworld.com in November 2002 states:

“Computerworld received numerous e-mail complaints that HPWREN was in violation of FCC power limits following publication of its original story.  Steve Bragg, a senior electronics engineer at Internet Telemetry Corp. in Tulsa Okla., called the HPWREN San Clemente Island link illegal, saying, ‘If I was the FCC, I would bust these guys.'”

Apparently no one was ever “busted” by the industry-controlled FCC, and the tower continues to operate directly adjacent to classrooms next to where the cancer cluster was centered.

As a result of her son’s death, Virginia has become an outspoken and tireless local and national advocate for wireless safety, and was interviewed for the smart meter investigative documentary Take Back Your Power.

Fort Collins is home to several smart grid firms and has a municipal electric utility- City of Fort Collins Light and Power (CFCLP).  CFCLP took a $15 million federal grant and borrowed $15 million for the purchase of smart electric meters on homes, putting city residents into debt for the first time in 75 years.  Deployment of the system- which includes a network of surveillance cameras- began in June 2013.  There are also plans to deploy “smart” gas and water meters.  As of last month, less than ten households remain with their original analogs in a city of approximately 150,000 people.   This is not because everyone is thrilled by having a “smart” meter on their home, but rather the heavy handed tactics the city has been using to force these meters on people.

Nasatir Hall on the left of this photo was where Rich Farver spent much of his time prior to developing a brain tumor in 2008. A HPWREN smart grid antenna cluster towers over the building where more than a dozen people have developed brain tumors. SDSU refuses to investigate the deaths, or compensate the families.

Fort Collins’ utility- like some other municipals and co-ops- has been going above the law and forcing unwanted devices on homes, using the threat of electricity disconnection- or even arrest- to achieve their aims.  Though the Farver family has refused a smart meter on their home, with Virginia telling utility smart grid manager Dennis Sumner that “this is my home and I will not have a (smart) meter on my house.”  Sumner replied, “You WILL get a meter.”  This is despite knowing about the circumstances around the death of their son.

True to his word, on March 6th, utility workers escorted by police arrived at the Farver home.  Virginia was in the bathroom getting ready when the power went out.   Still in her pajamas and curlers, she got outside and discovered that the cage surrounding their analog had been vandalized.  The smart meter was already on their home and utility workers were standing there looking ashamed, their heads down.   A Ft. Collins police officer was standing on the Farvers front porch, the threat of force implicit.

A good number of Ft. Collins residents had been refusing to allow the installation, when CFCLP decided to get tough around Thanksgiving of last year, on the orders of City Manager Darin Attaberry.   One woman, Dorothy Boyd- told the utility worker who arrived to install the meter “I opted out.”  He answered “you can’t opt out.”  This is despite Fort Collins city code section 26-712 that allowed for a $11/ month fee for retaining an electromechanical analog meter (the utility claims that the council has amended the law recently to prohibit safe analog meters after many people opted out.)  That’s when she noticed the policeman in her driveway with his legs spread looking grim.   She was afraid of being arrested, so allowed the meter installer to proceed.

Another older lady- Dr. Ruth Shea- tried to video her encounter with the police when she was ordered to “shut the camera off.”  Many residents- including those who had caged their meters in self-defense caved when the police came around and threatened to arrest them if they did not allow the meters.

It gets worse.

Now the City has developed a “confidential watch list” that includes “problem utility customers.”

IMG_0926According to Wayne Sterler of the Ft. Collins Utility Department, these customers (who pay their bills but who simply intend to retain their analog meters) will be “denied access to city facilities and buildings” if they persist in refusing the “progress” that is being forced on them.

The following is an excerpt from the November 24, 2013 Fort Collins Coloradan (the full article has been removed from the website but is available for purchase here.  The article- though making reference to the smart meter program- in Orwellian style never actually mentions the word “meter”):

“Utility sites need a constant eye, Sterler contends.  The U.S. Dept. of Energy recommends electronic eyes on key infrastructure and a steady increase in hostility and aggression toward utility employees from irate customers has put the department on high-alert.

‘We’ve probably had six situations in the past 4-5 months where we’ve had police involvement with angry customers,’ Sterler said, ‘individuals that are just basically not happy with their service being terminated or just not happy with having to pay their bill.’

The utility department maintains a list of problem customers whose agitation has led to police intervention.

‘These individuals are put on a list, where if it happens again, they are basically not able to access public facilities owned by the City of Fort Collins,’ Sterler said.

So far none of the people on the list have been forbidden from visiting city property.  Sterler said the list is confidential.

Report by Patrick Malone”

Like Naperville Illinois, where two mothers were arrested last year for standing in the way of installers at their own home, municipal utilities (as well as rural “co-operatives” like PSREC who cut off our power last month) have been among the worst offenders of the law.  It seems that some “public” officials have decided that they can get away with violating the law as long as the public generally stays in line and doesn’t rise up to protest.   The utility industry imposing its will on individuals backed by the threat of police force is an alarming symptom of rising corporatism (or fascism if you can stomach the term).

As the demise of the distributed electricity model looms due to plummeting solar panel costs and cheaper battery storage, the industry is attempting to tighten its grip on the meters (they call them their “cash registers”) and the customers that they depend on for their enormous profits.

When there is free market choice about how to power your home or business, the utility companies know they will lose in the end.  That is why enforcement of your patronage- with their chosen equipment – is essentially being forced by armed officers.   And it may get a lot worse before it gets better.

Why have utilities generally not utilized the same tactics in places like California, bringing in police to force the meters?  It’s not because PG&E wouldn’t like to (they would).  It’s that they know that if they did, the public would not tolerate it- there would be protests and riots in the streets.  And that kind of spectacle risks the whole multi-billion dollar program, and is to be avoided at all costs.

Utilities and governments will do whatever they can get away with, pressing as far as the public will tolerate without rebelling.   This is political science, and they have well-paid strategists working on the most effective way to force their sick, invasive agenda on the public.

They look at the public like a boiling pot- turn up the heat so they can force the meters but turn it down when it threatens to boil over into rebellion.

“People are rising up in Florida- give them an opt out- they will settle down…” was bound to be one of the refrains heard in the halls of Florida Power and Light (FPL) for example.

California’s “opt out” policy was only introduced when dozens of residents of Santa Cruz began having the meters removed themselves and replaced with analogs.  In 2010 and 2011, smart meters were supposedly “mandatory” in California and police enforcement likely would have been imminent if it weren’t for fearless people willing to take a public stand.   The “opt out” policy of $10/ month for investor owned utility customers like PG&E fragmented the boiling mad public, and took some of the steam out of the opposition, which is exactly what they wanted.   Those people who didn’t want a smart meter on their home could pay for this choice- and many did- (though thousands have continued to refuse to pay).  Stopping entire neighborhoods and cities from being blanketed by pulsed RF radiation can seem somewhat abstract in comparison to simply defending one’s home.   However, a community defense approach to stopping the meters is absolutely key.

Salt in the wounds: the smart meter the city forced on the Farvers

Salt in the wounds: the smart meter the city forced on the Farvers

The smart meter remains on the Farver’s home for now, partially shielded using a smart meter shield.  They have bought a true analog meter from Hialeah Meter, and are weighing their options at this time.   A number of Fort Collins residents who have had smart meters forced on them have also purchased analog meters, and together, plan on having them re-installed in the near future, in defiance of the City’s Orwellian agenda.

Because Craig Farver works for the City, the family is concerned that their activism around “smart”meters may result in him losing his job, though such a termination would be illegal under state employment law.

One thing is for certain.  The Farvers have suffered enough and do not deserve the wireless salt that Ft. Collins is rubbing in their still raw wounds from losing their son to out of control RF radiation.

We advise everyone to use the documents at freedomtaker.com, including the notice to police officers that enforcement of a civil matter on the side of the utility company is not legal and will not be tolerated.

Dennis Sumner- head of Ft. Collins smart grid program who personally forced a meter on the Farvers’ home, can be reached at (970) 221-6700 (ask for Dennis Sumner)  or e-mail him at dsumner@fcgov.com

Posted in Changing a Meter, Citizen rebellion, Colorado, Democracy, Installer Threats and Assaults, legal issues, neighborhood organizing, PG&E, Police, PSREC, radio-frequency radiation, Safety, Smart Grid | 23 Comments

Beware Unexpected (& Unlawful) Power Outages

IMG_0923

 

Posted in California, Plumas County, PSREC | Leave a comment

PSREC Joins Stop Smart Meters! Hall of Shame

Bob MarshallScreen Shot 2014-03-22 at 5.46.55 PM

You may have noticed that there is a new link at the top of our sidebar.

Congratulations! PSREC you have earned a page all your own on StopSmartMeters.Org.  The new page includes links to the unfolding dispute, a time line of all PSREC’s misdeeds, and previously unreleased correspondence.

For disconnecting our electricity in winter in the mountains even though we have paid our  bill, for threatening to install a device that my doctor has told you will damage my health, for committing extortion, coercion, fraud, and generally being a menace to health and the quality of life here in California’s Northern Sierra Nevada, PSREC General Manager Bob Marshall and Board of Directors have earned themselves the ongoing scrutiny and attention of Stop Smart Meters! (and increasingly the public at large).

Now turn on our electricity please and DROP THOSE FEES!!!!

You may have also noticed a link to the  “WhistleStop Smart Meters! US Tour.”    March 28th- April 5th, I’ll be stopping in Fort Collins, CO, Chapel Hill, NC, Savannah, Georgia, and Stuart, FL to stop smart meters and show Josh del Sol’s film Take Back Your Power.  Spread the word and if you are local, put up some posters!  We’ll be reporting from the rails so stay tuned ….

Posted in Plumas County, PSREC | 5 Comments

PSREC: “Go Live in the Forest”

PSREC wants us out of their hair somewhere out in the woods

PSREC wants us out of their hair somewhere out in the woods

Over the last several months, we have had numerous conversations with PSREC.   We have given them dozens of peer-reviewed scientific journal articles showing harm from wireless technology at levels far below what the FCC allows.  We lent them a copy of Take Back Your Power.  We have submitted a letter from my physician letting them know that RF exposure exacerbates a medical condition.  In short, we have bent over backwards to explain the harm that their “smart” meters are doing to ourselves and the community, but they just don’t seem to be able to listen.

When we moved to Plumas County last summer, we chose to move into a neighborhood because we like having others close by and we enjoy being part of a community- we didn’t want to be in the middle of nowhere.   On at least two occasions, PSREC General Manager Bob Marshall and Assistant General Manager Greg Lohn asked me, “why don’t you just go live in the forest somewhere?”

Their question has made me realize that this whole dispute is not about the analog meter, nor about the fees.  It’s not even about my electro-hyper-sensitivity.  It’s about the fact that we’re refusing to “just go live in the forest,” and be quiet about the health problems that smart meters and other wireless technology are causing.

This is a clear threat to not only PSREC’s smart metering agenda, but the whole government/ industry dogma that says wireless is safe.

We’re refusing to obey- to go away and be quiet and sit in the back of the bus.   And Bob Marshall and PSREC hate us for it.  Their disconnection of our electricity has only made us more steadfast in our refusal to pay these extortionate fees.  We’ll survive off the grid if we have to.

In the paper this week, Mr. Marshall is quoted as saying “we hate turning off people’s power, especially in winter.”  I actually think he quite enjoyed giving the order to cut the lines.  It’s what bullies love to do- pick on those most vulnerable.   He continues, “we have a short fuse about being denied access to our meters, however.”    Well, he definitely has a short fuse.  But since we have never denied them access to their meters for reading or maintenance purposes, he must be talking about someone else.   Maybe he means that we did not allow them to install a device that they have written documentation is medically harmful to me.  I can see how that might infuriate him.

To make matters worse, on Tuesday we caught PSREC Member and Energy Services Manager Corby Gardner- likely under direction from Mr. Marshall- discussing our account with a total stranger and providing false information to make us look bad.

Isn’t it pretty clear by now that these fees, and the lies PSREC is spreading about us, are intended to be payback for our awareness raising activities in the County?  Why else would we be charged a fee when hundreds of other PSREC customers are self-reading their analog meters at no extra charge?

If anything, this incident should make PSREC customers (and all of us) wary of that “smart” meter on the side of their homes.  If PSREC is willing to go to such lengths to silence and coerce a community health advocate raising safety problems with their meters, what are they trying so desperately to hide?

We’re not willing to obey the utility industry and just “go live in the forest.”  We don’t believe banishment from society should be an inevitable outcome of being injured by smart meter radiation.  Call us crazy but we love our community.

Local News Coverage this week: 

Public Officials Address Allegations Against Them

Supervisors Tackle Mixed Meeting Topics

And more supportive local letters to the editor- thank you!

IMG_0892

Posted in California, Class Issues and Social Equality, Democracy, Electro-Hyper-Sensitivity, interference, Plumas County, radio-frequency radiation, Safety | 6 Comments

Lots of Storytelling Going on at the PSREC Call Center

Because now apparently PSREC (our electric company who rudely shut us off one month ago for refusing to pay illegal, discriminatory, and unjustifiable “opt out” fees) has discovered that it cannot extort, coerce, silence, or intimidate us, they are now directing their call center staff to openly discuss our personal account and tell lies to the many people who have been calling them to protest our disconnect.

Like most corporations facing a crisis, they’re apparently attempting to “war game” the situation by trying to erode our credibility.  But it’s not going to work.    You can have your own opinion, but the facts are the facts and PSREC needs to stop lying to people.

This is the e-mail I received last night from one of our supporters (with our responses below in bold):

Hi Josh,
 
Your utility company called me today and stated the following:
 
– They say that you haven’t paid your November bill.

This is not true.  We have paid our November bill.  There was a mix up where the accumulating (illegal) opt out charges were combined with the past due November amount and we thought it was all opt out charges and neglected to pay this until it was brought to our attention.  Though we were speaking to them regularly they never mentioned that they hadn’t received November’s payment, and when they did inform us, they admitted they realized this was an oversight.   As soon as they brought this to our attention we paid the bill (minus the opt out charge of course).

Furthermore, isn’t it against company policy to discuss a member’s account with persons not listed on the account???

– You are in debt to them by a substantial sum of money regarding power used.  They refused to disclose how much you owe them and for what services rendered that you owe them.

We have paid for our electricity usage in full.  If PSREC has its way, over the course of ten years they would charge us more than $1941 as an opt out charge ($141.60 for the analog meter and $15/ month) but we never agreed (and do not agree) to service under those terms.

– You have fenced your property and will not let anyone onto the property to service or read the utility meter.

Bob Marshall: “I disagree with everything you said!”

Again, a lie.  Until PSREC’s General Manager Bob Marshall threatened to forcibly install a smart meter on our home in February (even though he has in his possession a letter from my physician saying this device is harmful to my health- a threat of assault, essentially) we had not locked up our fence and the meter reader was free to come and go as he pleased.    After we received Mr. Marshall’s threats, we secured our fence, which did not in any way ever interfere with meter reading or maintenance.  We informed PSREC that they would be free to access their meter for these purposes.  We have never locked up our analog meter.

– You have caged the utility meter and will not let anyone into it to service the utility meter.

Again, absolutely a bald faced lie.  Even though we probably should have done so, we have never locked up our analog meter or prevented access for bona fide utility needs. 

– They say they have given you a number of payment options and only disconnected you after trying to work this out with you.

Here are the “payment options” they offered us: 

1)  Pay us our extortion charge and we will allow you to follow the orders of your doctor and protect your family’s health.

2)  We shut off your electricity during winter in the mountains.

I queried them about the caged meter and she admitted that she has not seen it.  It appeared to be the PR lady who called me.  She was trying to make out that you had gas and wood burning appliances, so that it wasn’t a hardship for you. 

Right- cutting the electricity to an all-electric house in the mountains in winter is not creating a hardship!  Nice stories they tell themselves.  The reality is that we are lucky to have a wood burning stove but not all residents here have one.   The “gas appliance” we are using is a camping stove out back.   We have no running hot water, no refrigeration, no lights, no stove or oven, and no heat except where the woodstove can reach (and without our ceiling fan this is drastically reduced).   How dare they assume things about us and discuss these “assumptions” on the phone with people who call on our behalf?

Their engineer who has seen the cages is supposed to be calling me to discuss what you have done on the property.

Ummm….. we locked our garden gate.  This “engineer who has seen the cages” is lying, and most likely the same man who came here and photographed our property with a telephoto lens from a number of different angles the day after our power was cut.

Anyhow, now wanted to get your feedback before I call them again.  They are painting you as the problem to callers, which is quite standard practice in the utility industry.

You don’t say?

Posted in Animal Harm, California, Changing a Meter, Citizen rebellion, Class Issues and Social Equality, Electro-Hyper-Sensitivity, legal issues, Plumas County, radio-frequency radiation | 1 Comment